KC Heroscapers
http://kcheroscapers.getphpbb.com/

Standings - Updated 05/21
http://kcheroscapers.getphpbb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=245		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  TOG [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Standings - Updated 05/21
1. Greg/Kahrma (3-0) Won vs. Dan
2. Kyle/darkmantle (2-0) Won vs. Dan
3. Dan/paradox22 (2-5) Won vs. David
4. Eric/ej (1-1) Lost vs. Dan
5. Karl/madmuppet (0-1) Lost vs. Eric
6. David K./TOG (2-2) Lost to Dan
7. Dylan/Game_Breaker (1-1) Forfeited to TOG
8. Emillio/Emillio (2-1) Won vs. Chris
9. David H./bobofdeath (0-1) Lost vs. Emillio
10. Jon (0-1)/bobofdeath's Dad Lost vs. David K,
11. Cobracao/Chris (0-1) Lost vs. Emillio
12. BassAckwardz/Bill
Author:  madmuppet [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:33 pm ]
Post subject: 
Weird. Apparently I'm still confused on how this works.
Author:  darkmantle [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:57 pm ]
Post subject: 
What don't you understand? Eric was below you, he won, so he takes your spot, while you and everybody below you drop one slot. If Eric had lost against you, no change would have been made. I wasn't there, but from what I'm reading it appears Eric played you first and won, he then had your spot and you and everyone else below you dropped. Eric then challanged Dan and lost, therefor no additional changes were made as a result of that game.
Author:  madmuppet [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:39 pm ]
Post subject: 
It was my understanding a win only increased your standing by one level.

Either way it appears I got screwed by only wanting to play one ladder game but I didn't realize what happened until after the fact.
Author:  darkmantle [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:56 pm ]
Post subject: 
Yes, I could understand that too. In a way I like that idea, so everybody isn't trying to challange the #1 guy to get a shortcut to the top, but at the same time, if it were that way, nobody would ever need to challenge anybody more than 1 spot above themselves.
Author:  paradox22 [ Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:23 am ]
Post subject: 
darkmantle wrote:
I wasn't there, but from what I'm reading it appears Eric played you first and won, he then had your spot and you and everyone else below you dropped. Eric then challanged Dan and lost, therefor no additional changes were made as a result of that game.


Actually EJ beat Karl, then, after losing to greg, I challenged EJ, and won (barely), then took his newly aquired 2nd place spot... I think thats how it went down anyway.

By the Way... GREAT GAME EJ, that was honestly one of the toughest/funest games I've ever played! :D
Author:  madmuppet [ Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:33 am ]
Post subject: 
darkmantle wrote:
Yes, I could understand that too. In a way I like that idea, so everybody isn't trying to challange the #1 guy to get a shortcut to the top, but at the same time, if it were that way, nobody would ever need to challenge anybody more than 1 spot above themselves.


Yes I see that now after re-reading the rules. But I swear that's what I was told today... I just can't remember by who...or if it really happened.
Author:  TOG [ Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:45 am ]
Post subject: 
darkmantle wrote:
Yes, I could understand that too. In a way I like that idea, so everybody isn't trying to challange the #1 guy to get a shortcut to the top, but at the same time, if it were that way, nobody would ever need to challenge anybody more than 1 spot above themselves.


Which is why you can only challenge 5 rungs or 50% (whichever is higher)of the remaining ladder. It's not like Jon can challenge Greg, but is would be possible, to challenge Kyle, and then Greg, assuming that he beat Kyle.
Author:  darkmantle [ Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:50 am ]
Post subject: 
TOG wrote:
assuming that he beat Kyle.


Thats one heck of an assumption
Author:  TOG [ Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:53 am ]
Post subject: 
darkmantle wrote:
TOG wrote:
assuming that he beat Kyle.


Thats one heck of an assumption


Now be nice... :lol:
Author:  Bobofdeath's Dad [ Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:38 pm ]
Post subject: 
HEY, I could beat Kyle!!!
Author:  cobracao [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Names...
Is there any list anywhere where I could tell who was who on the board. I see the ladder names here, but when I look up the armies they are obviously by username. Heck, I don't even really remember everyones names yet!?! :p
Author:  Kc-Destruction [ Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Standings - Updated 05/21
So where are these games played? And how can a newcomer get on these standings?
Author:  cobracao [ Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Standings - Updated 05/21
So when do we start a 2009 ladder? :D
Author:  TOG [ Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Standings - Updated 05/21
cobracao wrote:
So when do we start a 2009 ladder? :D


When interest dictates the need... :lol:
Author:  RC-D2 [ Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Standings - Updated 05/21
I'm in if were starting.
Author:  RC-D2 [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Standings - Updated 05/21
Not being rude are we starting.
Author:  darkmantle [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Standings - Updated 05/21
I'm hopin we don't play for a long time, this is the longest I've held a top 3 position in something like this.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/